Head to head

AutoGen vs Dify

AutoGen and Dify both work in AI Agents. Here is how they stack up on pricing, access, context and our editorial scores, and which one to pick.

Side by side

Tool
AutoGenby Microsoft3.8Setuproll editorial score
Tool
Difyby Dify4.5Setuproll editorial score
PricingOpen SourceFree, self-host or bring your own key
PricingOpen SourceFree self-host + cloud plans
AccessAPI
AccessLocal
Contextn/a
Contextn/a
Open sourceYes
Open sourceYes
Best formulti-agent chat in ai agents
Best forLLM app and agent building
Setuproll score3.8
Setuproll score4.5

The verdict

Dify edges ahead overall, with a 4.5 Setuproll editorial score and a strong fit for llm app and agent building. AutoGen is the better pick when you want multi-agent chat in ai agents, and it stays in the running on price and access. Most teams choose Dify as the default and reach for AutoGen when their workflow leans that way.

Frequently asked questions

Is AutoGen or Dify better?

AutoGen holds a 3.8 Setuproll editorial score and is best for multi-agent chat in ai agents, while Dify holds a 4.5 and is best for llm app and agent building. Pick AutoGen for multi-agent chat in ai agents and Dify for llm app and agent building.

What is the difference between AutoGen and Dify?

AutoGen is reached as API (open source) with n/a, while Dify is reached as Local (open source) with n/a. They overlap on AI Agents but lead in different parts of the workflow.

Is AutoGen cheaper than Dify?

AutoGen is free, self-host or bring your own key, and Dify is free self-host + cloud plans. Both have a path to start without a large upfront cost.

Keep exploring

Other comparisons