ResearchReview protocol

Draft a systematic literature review protocol

Use when you need a rigorous, reproducible plan before starting a formal literature review.

The prompt
prompt.txt
Role: You are a research methodologist who designs systematic review protocols.

Topic: {{topic}}
Research question: {{research_question}}
Field: {{field}}

Produce a systematic literature review protocol with these sections:
1. PICO/PECO framing of the question.
2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria (population, study type, date range {{date_range}}, language, publication status).
3. Search strategy: list the databases to query and draft one Boolean search string per database using synonyms and controlled vocabulary.
4. Screening process (title/abstract then full text) with reviewer roles.
5. Data extraction fields as a table schema.
6. Quality and risk-of-bias appraisal method appropriate for this study type.
7. Planned synthesis approach (narrative vs meta-analysis) and justification.

Constraints: be specific to the field, flag any step where domain expertise is required, and note common pitfalls for this question type.

Click the copy button in the top right of the block to grab the full prompt.

Variables

Replace each placeholder below with your own values before you run the prompt.

  • {{topic}}
  • {{research_question}}
  • {{field}}
  • {{date_range}}
Recommended models
Claude Opus 4.8GPT-5Gemini 2.5 Pro
Tags
#literature-review#methodology#academic#protocol

Related prompts

ResearchLiterature review
Write a structured literature review

You are a research analyst writing a literature review. Topic: {{topic}} Field / discipline: {{field}} Time window to focus on: {{time_window}} Produce a literature review that: 1....

Claude Opus 4.xGPT-5Gemini 2.5 Pro
#literature-review#academic#synthesis
View
ResearchCompare options
Compare options with a decision matrix

Act as a neutral research assistant helping me choose between options. Options to compare: {{options}} My use case: {{use_case}} What matters most to me, in order: {{priorities}} M...

Claude Opus 4.xGPT-5Gemini 2.5 Pro
#comparison#decision#evaluation
View
ResearchFact-check
Fact-check a specific claim

You are a careful fact-checker. Claim to check: {{claim}} Context where I saw it: {{context}} Assess the claim and return: 1. Verdict: True, Mostly true, Mixed, Mostly false, False...

Claude Opus 4.xGPT-5Perplexity
#fact-checking#verification#claims
View
ResearchTopic deep dive
Deep dive into an unfamiliar topic

I want to deeply understand a topic I am new to. Topic: {{topic}} Why I am learning it: {{goal}} My current level: {{level}} Walk me through it in layers: 1. The one-paragraph big...

Claude Opus 4.xGPT-5Gemini 2.5 Pro
#deep-dive#explainer#overview
View
ResearchCited summary
Summarize a source with citations

Summarize the source below so a reader can trust where each point comes from. Return: 1. A 2-sentence overview of what the source is and its main argument. 2. {{point_count}} key p...

Claude Opus 4.xGPT-5Gemini 2.5 Pro
#summary#citations#sources
View
ResearchSource synthesis
Synthesize findings across several sources

You are synthesizing several sources into one clear picture. Question I am trying to answer: {{question}} Sources are pasted below, each marked with a label. Do the following: 1. S...

Claude Opus 4.xGPT-5Gemini 2.5 Pro
#synthesis#sources#analysis
View

0 Comments

Sign in to post

Loading discussion...