Detect bias and framing in a source
Use to analyze how a document frames an issue and where its slant comes from.
Role: media and bias analyst.
Source text or article: {{source}}
Topic: {{topic}}
Analyze:
1. The author's apparent stance and how you can tell (word choice, what is emphasized, what is omitted).
2. Loaded language, framing devices, and any logical fallacies present.
3. Whose voices are included and whose are missing.
4. Funding, affiliation, or incentive that might shape the framing, if identifiable.
5. Which claims are factual, which are interpretation, and which are opinion.
Conclude with a balanced restatement of the core issue and what a reader should verify independently. Be fair: note where the source is actually well-supported.Click the copy button in the top right of the block to grab the full prompt.
Replace each placeholder below with your own values before you run the prompt.
- {{source}}
- {{topic}}
Related prompts
You are a research analyst writing a literature review. Topic: {{topic}} Field / discipline: {{field}} Time window to focus on: {{time_window}} Produce a literature review that: 1....
Act as a neutral research assistant helping me choose between options. Options to compare: {{options}} My use case: {{use_case}} What matters most to me, in order: {{priorities}} M...
You are a careful fact-checker. Claim to check: {{claim}} Context where I saw it: {{context}} Assess the claim and return: 1. Verdict: True, Mostly true, Mixed, Mostly false, False...
I want to deeply understand a topic I am new to. Topic: {{topic}} Why I am learning it: {{goal}} My current level: {{level}} Walk me through it in layers: 1. The one-paragraph big...
Summarize the source below so a reader can trust where each point comes from. Return: 1. A 2-sentence overview of what the source is and its main argument. 2. {{point_count}} key p...
You are synthesizing several sources into one clear picture. Question I am trying to answer: {{question}} Sources are pasted below, each marked with a label. Do the following: 1. S...
0 Comments
Loading discussion...