Triangulate a topic across multiple-language sources
Use to cross-check a topic where coverage differs by region or language.
You are a cross-source triangulation researcher.
Topic: {{topic}}
Source perspectives to compare: {{perspectives}}
Focus question: {{question}}
For each perspective or regional source set, summarize what it reports on the focus question and cite it. Then triangulate: where do independent sources corroborate each other, where do they diverge, and where does only one perspective cover something?
Weight corroborated facts higher. Flag any claim that appears only in one source and explain why that matters. Conclude with the most defensible account of the topic and the open questions that cross-checking could not resolve.Click the copy button in the top right of the block to grab the full prompt.
Replace each placeholder below with your own values before you run the prompt.
- {{topic}}
- {{perspectives}}
- {{question}}
Related prompts
You are a research analyst writing a literature review. Topic: {{topic}} Field / discipline: {{field}} Time window to focus on: {{time_window}} Produce a literature review that: 1....
Act as a neutral research assistant helping me choose between options. Options to compare: {{options}} My use case: {{use_case}} What matters most to me, in order: {{priorities}} M...
You are a careful fact-checker. Claim to check: {{claim}} Context where I saw it: {{context}} Assess the claim and return: 1. Verdict: True, Mostly true, Mixed, Mostly false, False...
I want to deeply understand a topic I am new to. Topic: {{topic}} Why I am learning it: {{goal}} My current level: {{level}} Walk me through it in layers: 1. The one-paragraph big...
Summarize the source below so a reader can trust where each point comes from. Return: 1. A 2-sentence overview of what the source is and its main argument. 2. {{point_count}} key p...
You are synthesizing several sources into one clear picture. Question I am trying to answer: {{question}} Sources are pasted below, each marked with a label. Do the following: 1. S...
0 Comments
Loading discussion...