Pro10 min
Multi-Agent and Orchestrated Workflows
Some jobs are too big for one agent holding everything in one context. The fix is to split the work: a coordinator agent breaks the task into pieces and hands each to a specialist agent with its own narrow tools and instructions, then assembles the results. This keeps each context small, focused, and easier to debug.
Common orchestration patterns
| Pattern | Shape | Use when |
|---|---|---|
| Pipeline | A then B then C | Fixed, ordered stages |
| Router | Coordinator picks one specialist | Mixed request types |
| Parallel | Fan out, then merge | Independent subtasks |
| Reviewer | Worker, then critic loop | Quality matters |
A reviewer pattern is worth special mention: one agent does the work, a second agent checks it against the requirements and sends it back with notes if it falls short. This catches mistakes a single pass misses, at the cost of extra calls.
Multi-agent research flow
You
Research our top 3 competitors and draft a one-page brief.Agent
Coordinator: splitting into 3 research tasks, one per competitor, running in parallel.Agent
Specialist agents: returned facts, pricing, and positioning for each.Agent
Coordinator: merged findings, removed duplicates, drafted the brief. Reviewer agent approved.Do not reach for this too early
Multi-agent setups multiply cost, latency, and failure points. Most problems are solved by one well-equipped agent. Add a second agent only when a single one provably cannot hold the task, not because it sounds impressive.
Result: a workflow that handles a task too large for one context window, with each agent's work small enough to inspect and fix on its own.