Head to head

Convex vs Lovable

Convex and Lovable both work in AI Backend. Here is how they stack up on pricing, access, context and our editorial scores, and which one to pick.

Side by side

Tool
Convexby Convex3.8Setuproll editorial score
Tool
Lovableby Lovable4.6Setuproll editorial score
PricingFreemiumFree tier + usage plans
PricingFreemiumFree tier + paid plans
AccessAPI
AccessWeb app
Contextn/a
Contextn/a
Open sourceNo
Open sourceNo
Best forReactive backend for app builders
Best forShippable apps with no setup
Setuproll score3.8
Setuproll score4.6

The verdict

Lovable edges ahead overall, with a 4.6 Setuproll editorial score and a strong fit for shippable apps with no setup. Convex is the better pick when you want reactive backend for app builders, and it stays in the running on price and access. Most teams choose Lovable as the default and reach for Convex when their workflow leans that way.

Frequently asked questions

Is Convex or Lovable better?

Convex holds a 3.8 Setuproll editorial score and is best for reactive backend for app builders, while Lovable holds a 4.6 and is best for shippable apps with no setup. Pick Convex for reactive backend for app builders and Lovable for shippable apps with no setup.

What is the difference between Convex and Lovable?

Convex is reached as API (freemium) with n/a, while Lovable is reached as Web app (freemium) with n/a. They overlap on AI Backend but lead in different parts of the workflow.

Is Convex cheaper than Lovable?

Convex is free tier + usage plans, and Lovable is free tier + paid plans. Both have a path to start without a large upfront cost.

Keep exploring

Other comparisons