Head to head

Continue vs Cursor

Continue and Cursor both work in AI Coding. Here is how they stack up on pricing, access, context and our editorial scores, and which one to pick.

Side by side

Tool
Continueby Continue4.4Setuproll editorial score
Tool
Cursorby Anysphere4.7Setuproll editorial score
PricingOpen SourceFree, bring your own API key
PricingPaidFree tier + Pro $20/mo
AccessPlugin
AccessIDE
ContextModel-dependent
ContextModel-dependent, up to 200k
Open sourceYes
Open sourceNo
Best forCustomisable open assistant
Best forFast inline editing all day
Setuproll score4.4
Setuproll score4.7

The verdict

Cursor edges ahead overall, with a 4.7 Setuproll editorial score and a strong fit for fast inline editing all day. Continue is the better pick when you want customisable open assistant, and it stays in the running on price and access. Most teams choose Cursor as the default and reach for Continue when their workflow leans that way.

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or Cursor better?

Continue holds a 4.4 Setuproll editorial score and is best for customisable open assistant, while Cursor holds a 4.7 and is best for fast inline editing all day. Pick Continue for customisable open assistant and Cursor for fast inline editing all day.

What is the difference between Continue and Cursor?

Continue is reached as Plugin (open source) with Model-dependent, while Cursor is reached as IDE (paid) with Model-dependent, up to 200k. They overlap on AI Coding but lead in different parts of the workflow.

Is Continue cheaper than Cursor?

Continue is free, bring your own api key, and Cursor is free tier + pro $20/mo. Continue is open source, so it can be the cheaper option if you self-host.

Keep exploring

Other comparisons