Head to head

Continue vs Codex CLI

Continue and Codex CLI both work in AI Coding. Here is how they stack up on pricing, access, context and our editorial scores, and which one to pick.

Side by side

Tool
Continueby Continue4.4Setuproll editorial score
Tool
Codex CLIby OpenAI4.7Setuproll editorial score
PricingOpen SourceFree, bring your own API key
PricingPaidUsage billing on API
AccessPlugin
AccessCLI
ContextModel-dependent
ContextModel-dependent
Open sourceYes
Open sourceNo
Best forCustomisable open assistant
Best forScripted coding from the command line
Setuproll score4.4
Setuproll score4.7

The verdict

Codex CLI edges ahead overall, with a 4.7 Setuproll editorial score and a strong fit for scripted coding from the command line. Continue is the better pick when you want customisable open assistant, and it stays in the running on price and access. Most teams choose Codex CLI as the default and reach for Continue when their workflow leans that way.

Frequently asked questions

Is Continue or Codex CLI better?

Continue holds a 4.4 Setuproll editorial score and is best for customisable open assistant, while Codex CLI holds a 4.7 and is best for scripted coding from the command line. Pick Continue for customisable open assistant and Codex CLI for scripted coding from the command line.

What is the difference between Continue and Codex CLI?

Continue is reached as Plugin (open source) with Model-dependent, while Codex CLI is reached as CLI (paid) with Model-dependent. They overlap on AI Coding but lead in different parts of the workflow.

Is Continue cheaper than Codex CLI?

Continue is free, bring your own api key, and Codex CLI is usage billing on api. Continue is open source, so it can be the cheaper option if you self-host.

Keep exploring

Other comparisons